Some moments of truth have still leaked out behind the noisy propaganda crackling and triumphant euphoria that overwhelmed the infidel media and cheap fables that bin Laden was "hiding from the bullets behind his wife".
As it turned out, the first person who reported about the fierce battle in his microblog Twitter was a local IT-consultant Sohaib Athar, who lives in Abbottabad, where all the events occurred, the BBC News says.
In Twitter, shortly before the battle, Mr. Athar wrote that helicopters had probably belonged to armed forces of Pakistan flying over Abbottabad. He noted that such flights were quite rare in those areas.
Then, according to records of Athar, some explosions were heard. Later, it became known that a damaged helicopter had been blown up. Sohaib Athar had not only described his observations on Twitter, but also gathered information from his friends who were on the web.
So, he found out that not all helicopters belonged to the Pakistani armed forces, and that a helicopter had been probably shot down, and not crashed.
Athar realized why the helicopter was used and what happened only after he heard the Obama's speech in which he spoke about the assassination of Osama bin Laden.
However, it was found out from a resident of Abbottabad in his microblog that the shootout in the town (western propaganda called it a "military presence in the town") lasted for about 2 hours, while the US military earlier said that "the operation lasted less than 40 minutes".
It is to be recalled thereupon that, after several contradictory statements, the Americans nevertheless recognized that the aim of the attack in Abbottabad was to capture bin Laden alive. However, the Emir of al-Qaeda did not allow them to do so. The Americans told that after the offer to surrender, bin Laden and his son opened fire to kill them.
If the version of the Americans is to be believed, they have not managed to get close to bin Laden. The Emir of al-Qaeda was killed by a sniper bullet in the head. (Later, the Americans have changed their story and said that bin Laden had rendered no resistance at all and was just a shot in his abdomen and head).
Beyond that, it became that there were 2 women together with bin Laden in the house. No accurate information is available about their fate. It was reported that they had been both killed, then it was stated that there had been only one woman, and that she had been wounded and is now in captivity of the US.
The American propaganda is now full of all sorts of small details of what happened. Here we have Obama watching the operation live, and reports about the CIA noting that "no one carrying out garbage from the enormous mansion", and the flight of special forces for the operation, etc. etc.
Photos of the damaged house with traces of blood have been also published. The media runs the standard disinformation stories interspersed with cheap lies that are usually distributed in such cases.
However, there are still quite a number of natural questions.
Why don't the Americans publish any video or photos of the martyred bin Laden. Furthermore, the American story that bin Laden's "was buried" in the Arabian Sea (i.e. 1,200 km from the scene), few hours after his assassination, seems quite improbable.
The allegation that the US made a genetic test of the bin Laden's DNA few hours after his martyrdom (as reported by cutting off his hand, which looks more like a pagan ritual) seem at least improbable, while such tests require several days.
We think there are only 2 reasons to explain that.
First - bin Laden was not in the house that was attacked by the Americans.
Second - Bin Laden was indeed killed, but the body was so badly damaged, or the Americans desecrated his body doing some of their pagan ritual, that it was not possible to identify him visually.
The Americans claimed that they had allegedly buried the body in the sea (performing the Islamic funeral prayer), because they feared attacks on US targets inside Pakistan with a demand to hand over the body.
In fact, it is well known that by Sharia it is not allowed to bury the dead Muslim in the water, which was already pointed out by Islamic scholars in Egypt and other countries that commented on the contentious US statement about the "bin Laden's burial in the sea with the observance of Islamic customs".
There could be a third purely hypothetical version. The Pakistanis did not allow the Americans to take the body of bin Laden, which is, however, unlikely.
We would like to point out in conclusion that if bin Laden's martyrdom is confirmed, it will only prove that he met his death in the Jihad for which he lived all his life and for which called Muslims on. He took martyrdom in battle, as befits the Mujahideen. This fact could not be distorted even by most sophisticated propaganda lies.
The martyrdom of bin Laden is in fact only a symbolic victory for America, as most experts suggest. It certainly will increase the rating of Obama and boost his chance to regain a seat in the White House, but nothing else.
10 years. 2 wars. Millions of dead and wounded. Hundreds of billions dollars spent to kill a single man. Glorious is Allah! Who could ever consider that a victory being in his right mind?!
In addition, it is sufficient to look superficially at the Muslim world to clearly recognize the undeniable fact - bin Laden's death cannot stop the Jihad. The flame of Jihad spreads with relentless force, and the Americans kindled it themselves by unleashing their global war against Islam.
And this war is not of tanks and planes, not of commanders and soldiers. This is a war of ideas and ideologies, a war of senses and ways of life, a war of hearts and human will. This is a war in which peace is impossible without a complete and final victory.
Ruslan Sinbarigov
for Kavkaz Center
No hay comentarios:
Publicar un comentario