The 2012 Olympic Games Exposed (1/2) - al Español

Me parece un importante e interesante aporte de investigación, en el que debido a experiencias anteriores, así como a los códigos secretos que hemos logrado descifrar sobre los orquestadores de los eventos de falsas banderas. Ahora se nos presentan estas evidencias de algo que podría suceder durante estos próximos Juegos Olímpicos.
No deseamos que suceda algo así, pero debemos darnos cuenta del verdadero poder detrás de escena....un poder que le teme a una sola cosa, y eso es a NUESTRA CONCIENCIA DESPIERTA y utilizándola para el BIEN.
No nos dejemos engañar y sumemos esfuerzos para revertir este tipo de eventos.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wT7KBz96hn0&feature=player_embedded

Marrakech.El explosivo se accionó por control remoto, lo que anula la hipótesis de un ataque suicida

Rabat no descarta a Al Qaeda como autor del atentado de Marrakech
El explosivo se accionó por control remoto, lo que anula la hipótesis de un ataque suicida

AGENCIAS / MARRAKECH-PARÍS
El Gobierno marroquí mantiene abiertas «todas las líneas de investigación» sobre el atentado de Marrakech, «incluida la de Al Qaeda», aunque por el momento prefirió no responsabilizar a ningún grupo terrorista del ataque contra la cafetería Argana ocurrido el pasado jueves en plena medina de la ciudad y en el que murieron 15 personas y resultaron heridas de diferente consideración a otras 20.
El ministro del Interior alauita, Taieb Cherqaoui, anunció que la investigación preliminar del golpe sangriento reveló que la bomba fue accionada por control remoto y, por tanto, no se trató de un atentado suicida, como se pensaba según las declaraciones de algunos testigos que apuntaban a un kamikaze que habría entrado en la cocina del establecimiento o de un joven que dejó una mochila dentro del local. «No se trata de un suicida (...) y parece que el artefacto explosivo fue accionado a distancia. La investigación sigue en curso», señaló. Según el político, el explosivo estaba fabricado con nitrato de amonio y explosivos TATP y se le había añadido clavos para que actuaran como metralla. Cherqaoui, que subrayó que «es de sobra conocido quién emplea esta modus operandi», instó a los marroquíes a mantenerse vigilantes, a cerrar filas y a privilegiar los intereses supremos del Estado.

Balance provisional. La versión oficial acerca de las víctimas mortales incluye a dos marroquíes, dos franceses, dos canadienses y un holandés, que fueron identificados ayer, según informó el Ministerio del Interior.
A través de un comunicado, el departamento gubernamental, que rectificó la cifra total de perecidos y aseguró que los fallecidos son 15 y no 16 como se había dicho en las últimas informaciones. Asimismo, apuntó que la Policía científica continúa el trabajo de reconocimiento de los cadáveres, además de contar con la colaboración de expertos españoles.
También se especula sobre la nacionalidad de dos de los fallecidos, una mujer israelí embarazada en sus últimos meses de gestación y su marido judío, que se encontraban de visita. Algunos medios locales hebreos los identificaron como Michal Weizmann Zikri y Masud Zikri, una pareja que residía en China y que estaban de viaje por Marruecos para visitar al padre de ella al estar embarazada de su segundo hijo.
Además, la primera fuente gubernamental extranjera en posicionarse fue el ministro del Interior francés, Claude Guéant, que anunció que al menos hay seis muertos y siete heridos de nacionalidad gala. «En este momento, los datos de los que disponemos indican, y lo digo con reservas, que habría seis franceses fallecidos y ocho afectados más», declaró.
El secretario general de la cartera de Sanidad, Rahal Makaui, aseveró en el transcurso de una visita al hospital Ibn Tufail de Marrakech, donde fueron ingresadas parte de las víctimas, que ocho ciudadanos franceses, dos marroquíes y una ciudadana holandesa están siendo atendidos de sus lesiones. Makaui agregó que evolucionan favorablemente y que el resto de afectados se encuentra en el Hospital Militar de esta ciudad y en clínicas privadas. Además, los médicos han hallado «objetos metálicos extraños» en los cuerpos de tres de los lisiados, según informó el director del servicio de urgencias, Hisham Najmi, quien explicó que hay cinco miembros de una misma familia francesa, dos menores, y que todos ellos están fuera de peligro, salvo el padre del citado grupo, cuya situación es muy grave.

continúa el ‘shock’. Un cocinero y uno de los camareros del café-restaurante Argana, escenario del atentado, relataron que la explosión fue «terrible» e hizo temblar el edificio del local. Abdelkader Lachab, de 23 años, que visitó ayer a un compañero suyo que se halla ingresado en el hospital, confesó que, tras el estruendo, vio restos humanos todavía en llamas cuando salió a la terraza. «El trabajo por la mañana había sido normal. Estábamos preparando las comidas, escuchamos una explosión muy fuerte, y entró una corriente de aire durante 10 segundos», dijo. «Pensamos que era una bombona de gas. Me entró pánico y escapé hacia la planta de arriba, y allí en la terraza me encontré con restos humanos en llamas, y cuatro personas que aún se movían», narró.
El camarero Mulay Driss, de 28 años, explicó que un amigo del trabajo llamado Yasin murió en la explosión, y que él aún tiene problemas de audición tras el atentado. Un taxista, que se hallaba estacionado a unos metros del Argana en el momento del estallido y que prefirió guardar el anonimato, señaló que en un primer momento creyó que eran las ruedas de su coche, que sintió «mucho miedo» y que el estruendo fue «gigantesco».

http://www.latribunadealbacete.es/

____________________________________________

Marruecos detiene al director del periódico más leído del país, Rachid Nini. Nini acusó en el rotativo a los aparatos de seguridad del Estado de trabajar para agendas políticas de algunos partidos y grupos de presión, y de sacar provecho indirectamente de actos terroristas.
<<<<<<<

Otras informaciones: El Rey de Marruecos "necesita desesperadamente un atentado de al-qaeda" para frenar las revueltas.

Esperanza Aguirre ofrece "todo su apoyo y respaldo" a los medios que investiguen sobre el 11-M

El PSOE: "Aznar ha vuelto con fuerza y hemos vuelto a la teoría de la conspiración y a las mentiras"

ELPLURAL.COM

Los dirigentes del Partido Popular se han apuntado al estoicismo y a su teoría del eterno retorno. Sólo así se explica que aún recurran a la conspiranoia del 11-M que tan pocos frutos les dio en el pasado. No obstante, la estrategia deja bastante que desear, al menos por el empeño de jugar a dos bandas. Desde Génova insisten en que no se ha dado ninguna orden para volver a las andadas, sino más bien todo lo contrario. Sin embargo, sus dirigentes andan desbocados alentando las mismas sospechas de los últimos años, aunque a título personal, eso sí. La última en sumarse ha sido Esperanza Aguirre, si es que alguna vez lo dejó de lado, asegurando que los medios que buscan “indagar en algunas de las cuestiones que se han dado a lo mejor por zanjadas” también “tienen todo mi apoyo y todo mi respaldo”.

• Noticias relacionadas

  • Arenas resucita en la tele de Pedro J. la conspiración del 11-M implicando a ETA
  • El PP y su reincidencia habitual a la hora de plegarse a los conspiranoicos

Ayer, Javier Arenas, vicesecretario de Política Autonómica del PP, era quien se desplazaba al plató de La vuelta al mundopara ser entrevistado por el abanderado de la conspiranoia: Pedro J. Ramírez. Allí prometió que si su partido gobierna en 2012, impulsará investigaciones sobre “muchas incógnitas que quedan por resolver”.

Aguirre se suma al carro
Hoy, el relevo lo ha recogido la presidenta de la Comunidad de Madrid, Esperanza Aguirre, a colación de la entrevista y la respectiva portada de hoy en El Mundo. "No pude desgraciadamente ver ayer a Javier Arenas en Veo 7. He visto el titular de portada del 'El Mundo', que dice algo así como que en un país en el que hay terrorismo interno, es raro que haya un atentado terrorista sin que tengan contacto. Creo, ¿eh?", ha dicho Aguirre.

"En relación al 11-M y su investigación, mi apoyo es total a los jueces, a los fiscales, a las fuerzas y cuerpos de seguridad del Estado en todo lo que están haciendo para cumplir cada uno de ellos con su deber", aseguró Aguirre, aunque añadió que “las informaciones periodísticas y el indagar en algunas de las cuestiones que se han dado a lo mejor por zanjadas, que puedan hacer los periódicos, radios, medios de comunicación y los periodistas en este país, especialmente en España, donde han sido algunos medios los que han destapado grandes escándalos, tienen también todo mi apoyo y todo mi respaldo".

Sin instrucciones de Rajoy
Desde Génova, insisten en que Rajoy “no ha dado instrucciones” para volver sobre el 11-M, según fuentes del PP citadas por Pablo Montesinos en Libertad Digital. En realidad, las órdenes, de haberlas, serían en dirección contraria, según esas mismas fuentes:"Nos ceñimos a los que dijo la Justicia. Al juicio que dictó sentencia y que dijo lo que dijo. Si se conocen nuevos detalles, pediremos explicaciones por los mismos".

Pero, o la realidad no se ajusta a ese discurso oficial, o la unidad del PP no es tan sólida como la pintan. Desde luego, en España poca gente ignora la obsesión de Pedro J. Ramírez con el 11-M, por lo que, cuando María Dolores de Cospedal (secretaria general del PP), Esteban González Pons (vicesecretario de Comunicación) y Javier Arenas (vicesecretario de Política Autonómica), acudieron a su programa debieron prever que ese asunto surgiría en algún momento. Y, desde luego, todos, sin excepción, se pusieron de parte del periodista riojano.

“Aznar ha vuelto con fuerza”
En el PSOE, Elena Valenciano ha sido la encargada de responder a las insinuaciones del PP: "Parece que Aznar ha vuelto con fuerza. Su paso por Sevilla ha sido letal y hemos vuelto a la teoría de la conspiración y a las mentiras", ha asegurado a los periodistas la secretaria de Política Internacional y Cooperación socialista durante la sesión de hoy en el Congreso de los Diputados. “Esa gran mentira que le hizo tanto daño a este país también fue juzgado... por lo tanto, parece absolutamente improcedente volver sobre esa cuestión" ha replicado la dirigente del PSOE.

http://www.elplural.com/politica/detail.php?id=55117

PROPAGANDA ALERT - Phony Al Qaeda bomb manual published on internet.

Al-Qaeda has produced a new bomb-making manual in English with the aim of encouraging self-starting terrorists to launch their own attacks.

Webmaster's Commentary:

This is a replay of a hoax from the late 1960s called the "Black Panther Coloring Book." Actually created by the FBI (and exposed during the COINTELPRO leaks), this was a book filled with highly racist drawings that was mailed into American homes (even we got one in West Covina) in order to give the US Media an easy means to demonize the growing civil rights movement that was pointing out that the Vietnam draft seemed to place most of the black kids on the front lines and most of the white kids in the rear support areas. Likewise, as the white population began to listen to the legitimate concerns of the black population, and as Martin Luther King gained popularity, young people, "The Hippies", also started mobilizing against the war, which led to a second fraudulent book released in the early 1970s called "The Anarchist Cookbook." Like the above "Al Qaeda" manual, the Anarchist Cookbook was filled with recipes for making bombs. The Anarchist Cookbook was created to allow the media to scare ordinary Americans that dangerous anarchists were in their midst, requiring draconian police and FBI powers. Hoaxes by the Nixon administration, including the "Peacnik" riot at Disneyland and the SLA, were used to further terrorize the American people.

Here is the point that relates to the current hoax. The recipes for explosives in the Anarchist Cookbook were intentionally flawed. Key stabilizing ingredients were left out in the hopes that some idiot playing with the formulas would blow up his own house, thereby handing the media another "terrorist bomb lab" for the media to wave around.

So, along with guaranteeing you that this Al Qaeda bomb making manual is another intelligence agency fake, I can also promise you that the formulas in it are intended to trick you into killing yourself in a spectacular manner intended to allow the media to claim you are an "Al Qaeda" terrorist in our midst to justify further removal of our Constitutional Bill of Rights.

UPDATE: The source for this "Al Qaeda" bomb book is none other than MEMRI.

http://whatreallyhappened.com/

___________________________________________

Selective Memri

Brian Whitaker investigates whether the 'independent' media institute that translates the Arabic newspapers is quite what it seems

• Brian Whitaker
• guardian.co.uk, Monday 12 August 2002 11.29 BST
• Article history

For some time now, I have been receiving small gifts from a generous institute in the United States. The gifts are high-quality translations of articles from Arabic newspapers which the institute sends to me by email every few days, entirely free-of-charge.

The emails also go to politicians and academics, as well as to lots of other journalists. The stories they contain are usually interesting.

Whenever I get an email from the institute, several of my Guardian colleagues receive one too and regularly forward their copies to me - sometimes with a note suggesting that I might like to check out the story and write about it.

If the note happens to come from a more senior colleague, I'm left feeling that I really ought to write about it. One example last week was a couple of paragraphs translated by the institute, in which a former doctor in the Iraqi army claimed that Saddam Hussein had personally given orders to amputate the ears of military deserters.

The organisation that makes these translations and sends them out is the Middle East Media Research Institute (Memri), based in Washington but with recently-opened offices in London, Berlin and Jerusalem.

Its work is subsidised by US taxpayers because as an "independent, non-partisan, non-profit" organisation, it has tax-deductible status under American law.

Memri's purpose, according to its website, is to bridge the language gap between the west - where few speak Arabic - and the Middle East, by "providing timely translations of Arabic, Farsi, and Hebrew media".

Despite these high-minded statements, several things make me uneasy whenever I'm asked to look at a story circulated by Memri. First of all, it's a rather mysterious organisation. Its website does not give the names of any people to contact, not even an office address.

The reason for this secrecy, according to a former employee, is that "they don't want suicide bombers walking through the door on Monday morning" (Washington Times, June 20).

This strikes me as a somewhat over-the-top precaution for an institute that simply wants to break down east-west language barriers.

The second thing that makes me uneasy is that the stories selected by Memri for translation follow a familiar pattern: either they reflect badly on the character of Arabs or they in some way further the political agenda of Israel. I am not alone in this unease.

Ibrahim Hooper of the Council on American-Islamic Relations told the Washington Times: "Memri's intent is to find the worst possible quotes from the Muslim world and disseminate them as widely as possible."

Memri might, of course, argue that it is seeking to encourage moderation by highlighting the blatant examples of intolerance and extremism. But if so, one would expect it - for the sake of non-partisanship - t o publicise extremist articles in the Hebrew media too.

Although Memri claims that it does provide translations from Hebrew media, I can't recall receiving any.

Evidence from Memri's website also casts doubt on its non-partisan status. Besides supporting liberal democracy, civil society, and the free market, the institute also emphasises "the continuing relevance of Zionism to the Jewish people and to the state of Israel".

That is what its website used to say, but the words about Zionism have now been deleted. The original page, however, can still be found in internet archives.

The reason for Memri's air of secrecy becomes clearer when we look at the people behind it. The co-founder and president of Memri, and the registered owner of its website, is an Israeli called Yigal Carmon.

Mr - or rather, Colonel - Carmon spent 22 years in Israeli military intelligence and later served as counter-terrorism adviser to two Israeli prime ministers, Yitzhak Shamir and Yitzhak Rabin.

Retrieving another now-deleted page from the archives of Memri's website also throws up a list of its staff. Of the six people named, three - including Col Carmon - are described as having worked for Israeli intelligence.

Among the other three, one served in the Israeli army's Northern Command Ordnance Corps, one has an academic background, and the sixth is a former stand-up comedian.

Col Carmon's co-founder at Memri is Meyrav Wurmser, who is also director of the centre for Middle East policy at the Indianapolis-based Hudson Institute, which bills itself as "America's premier source of applied research on enduring policy challenges".

The ubiquitous Richard Perle, chairman of the Pentagon's defence policy board, recently joined Hudson's board of trustees.

Ms Wurmser is the author of an academic paper entitled Can Israel Survive Post-Zionism? in which she argues that leftwing Israeli intellectuals pose "more than a passing threat" to the state of Israel, undermining its soul and reducing its will for self-defence.

In addition, Ms Wurmser is a highly qualified, internationally recognised, inspiring and knowledgeable speaker on the Middle East whose presence would make any "event, radio or television show a unique one" - according to Benador Associates, a public relations company which touts her services.

Nobody, so far as I know, disputes the general accuracy of Memri's translations but there are other reasons to be concerned about its output.

The email it circulated last week about Saddam Hussein ordering people's ears to be cut off was an extract from a longer article in the pan-Arab newspaper, al-Hayat, by Adil Awadh who claimed to have first-hand knowledge of it.

It was the sort of tale about Iraqi brutality that newspapers would happily reprint without checking, especially in the current atmosphere of war fever. It may well be true, but it needs to be treated with a little circumspection.

Mr Awadh is not exactly an independent figure. He is, or at least was, a member of the Iraqi National Accord, an exiled Iraqi opposition group backed by the US - and neither al-Hayat nor Memri mentioned this.

Also, Mr Awadh's allegation first came to light some four years ago, when he had a strong personal reason for making it. According to a Washington Post report in 1998, the amputation claim formed part of his application for political asylum in the United States.

At the time, he was one of six Iraqis under arrest in the US as suspected terrorists or Iraqi intelligence agents, and he was trying to show that the Americans had made a mistake.

Earlier this year, Memri scored two significant propaganda successes against Saudi Arabia. The first was its translation of an article from al-Riyadh newspaper in which a columnist wrote that Jews use the blood of Christian or Muslim children in pastries for the Purim religious festival.

The writer, a university teacher, was apparently relying on an anti-semitic myth that dates back to the middle ages. What this demonstrated, more than anything, was the ignorance of many Arabs - even those highly educated - about Judaism and Israel, and their readiness to believe such ridiculous stories.

But Memri claimed al-Riyadh was a Saudi "government newspaper" - in fact it's privately owned - implying that the article had some form of official approval.

Al-Riyadh's editor said he had not seen the article before publication because he had been abroad. He apologised without hesitation and sacked his columnist, but by then the damage had been done.

Memri's next success came a month later when Saudi Arabia's ambassador to London wrote a poem entitled The Martyrs - about a young woman suicide bomber - which was published in al-Hayat newspaper.

Memri sent out translated extracts from the poem, which it described as "praising suicide bombers". Whether that was the poem's real message is a matter of interpretation. It could, perhaps more plausibly, be read as condemning the political ineffectiveness of Arab leaders, but Memri's interpretation was reported, almost without question, by the western media.

These incidents involving Saudi Arabia should not be viewed in isolation. They are part of building a case against the kingdom and persuading the United States to treat it as an enemy, rather than an ally.

It's a campaign that the Israeli government and American neo-conservatives have been pushing since early this year - one aspect of which was the bizarre anti-Saudi briefing at the Pentagon, hosted last month by Richard Perle.

To anyone who reads Arabic newspapers regularly, it should be obvious that the items highlighted by Memri are those that suit its agenda and are not representative of the newspapers' content as a whole.

The danger is that many of the senators, congressmen and "opinion formers" who don't read Arabic but receive Memri's emails may get the idea that these extreme examples are not only truly representative but also reflect the policies of Arab governments.

Memri's Col Carmon seems eager to encourage them in that belief. In Washington last April, in testimony to the House committee on international relations, he portrayed the Arab media as part of a wide-scale system of government-sponsored indoctrination.

"The controlled media of the Arab governments conveys hatred of the west, and in particular, of the United States," he said. "Prior to September 11, one could frequently find articles which openly supported, or even called for, terrorist attacks against the United States ...

"The United States is sometimes compared to Nazi Germany, President Bush to Hitler, Guantanamo to Auschwitz," he said.

In the case of the al-Jazeera satellite channel, he added, "the overwhelming majority of guests and callers are typically anti-American and anti-semitic".

Unfortunately, it is on the basis of such sweeping generalisations that much of American foreign policy is built these days.

As far as relations between the west and the Arab world are concerned, language is a barrier that perpetuates ignorance and can easily foster misunderstanding.

All it takes is a small but active group of Israelis to exploit that barrier for their own ends and start changing western perceptions of Arabs for the worse.

It is not difficult to see what Arabs might do to counter that. A group of Arab media companies could get together and publish translations of articles that more accurately reflect the content of their newspapers.

It would certainly not be beyond their means. But, as usual, they may prefer to sit back and grumble about the machinations of Israeli intelligence veterans.

The following correction was printed in the Guardian's Corrections and Clarifications column, Wednesday August 21 2002

In an article headed Atrocity stories regain currency, page 13, August 8, and in an article headed Selective Memri on the Guardian website, we referred to Dr Adil Awadh, an Iraqi doctor who alleged that Saddam Hussein had ordered doctors to amputate the ears of soldiers who deserted. Dr Awadh has asked us to make it clear that he has no connection with Memri (Middle East Media Research Institute), and that he did not authorise its translation of parts of an article by him. He is no longer a member of the Iraqi National Accord (INA). He is an independent member of the Iraqi National Congress (INC). His reference to orders by Saddam Hussein to cut off the ears of deserters has been supported by evidence from other sources.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2002/aug/12/worlddispatch.brianwhitaker

False flag terrorist attack in Germany could be used for mass arrests of government critis

Following unprecedented protests in Germany, in Stuttgart and Gorleben, against the creeping authoritarianism, the government is trying to exploit an alleged threat to the Berlin’s Reichstag building by Islamic terrorists to bring the economical, political and social life of the country fully under control.

In spite of the fact that there is no credible threat of violence from terrorists– a lawyer defending an 18 year old who put up a “terrorist threat” video has recently said the youth was set up by a German police officer acting as an agent provocateur – at least 33,000 armed police are now patrolling airports and stations in Germany together with unknown numbers of private security guards.

http://www.bild.de/BILD/politik/2010/11/21/terror-alarm-in-deutschland-kann-die-polizei-uns/wirklich-beschuetzen.html

The German police chief Matthias Seeger told the „Frankfurter Allgemeinen Sonntagszeitung“ (FAS) that the police have been given instructions to use their weapons and he is actively encouraging people to shoot and kill anyone suspected as a terrorist.

Interior Minister Thomas de Maiziere has said that he expects a “terrorist” attack between November 20^th and 28^th just as the government is set to pass a draconian budget to allow for huge transfers of the tax payer’s money to the banks under the pretext of having to pay off fraudulent, fractional reserve banking debts.

The focus on the Reichstag in Berlin is highly significant because this building was at the centre of an arson attack on February 28^th, 1933 that Adolf Hitler then used as an excuse to consolidate the Nazi grip on power just before elections in March 1933.

There are many parallels to the Reichstag Fire — which appears also to have been staged according to a book by “XX” — including the armament of the police just one week beforehand.

Marinus van der Lubbe, a young Dutch man, was able to access the Reichstag without any problems, walking through a side door while a police officer who was alerted to the fire by a passerby allowed it to burn for almost half an hour before calling the fire brigade at about 10 pm.

According to historian John Toland (“Adolf Hitler”, page 297), Hermann Göring purged the ranks of the Prussian police, issued them weapons and also gave them explicit instructions to make use of their weapons against protestors on February 20^th just one week before the Reichstag’s Fire. Göring even threatened police who “failed to do their duty” and use their weapons against members of “organizations hostile to the state” with punishment.

Hitler used the Reichstag fire as a pretext to introduce the “decree of the president for the protection of the people and state” on 28^th of February. This suspended the freedom of assembly and expression, authorized wiretaps, houses searches and indefinite detention without warrants and paved the way for mass arrests of opposition figures.

In fact, the Reichstag Fire is considered to mark the start of the Nazi German terror state.

In spite of the evidence that Lubbe was acting alone, Hitler immediately declared the Communists to be responsible. He drove straight to the offices of the “Völkische Beobachter “, a newspaper that his supporters had bought for him in 1919, and ordered the subeditor on night duty to spin the story of the fire in such a way that the Communists and opposition were blamed.

Göring even rewrote the police statement to exaggerate the danger, according to Toland.

Hitler then summoned the cabinet to Göring’s office – a majority were not National Socialists — and that same night a decree was passed that stripped people of Germany all their basic civic rights.

Prince August Wilhelm of Hohenzollern, the son of the last German emperor, who was a big supporter of Hitler, attended the meeting and approved the decree.

Following the Reichstag Fire and the mass arrests, Hitler conducted an election campaign devoid of all concrete policies, appealing to German culture and “destiny”.

It is surely tempting for the government to use the same emergency measures designed to deal with a non existent terrorist threat in Germany to try to crush growing protests and demands for democracy.

These have reached a scale where the government might only think they can stopped by arresting thousands of key figures in a swift and sudden action.

Even though the Leipzig supreme court established no connection between Lubbe and the Communists, Hitler used the fire to arrest and imprison and often kill political opponents on the basis of the most tenuous of connections.

It would be easy to engineer some fictitious link between the “Islamic terrorists” and Stuttgart 21 protestors or Castor 21 protestors or even between individual opposition figures and bloggers, and so deliver the police chiefs in the know with an excuse to make an arrest.

For example, We Are Change Austria put up statement on their message boards this summer allegedly from me in which I expressed humorous support of Al Qaeda while hiding the email address which would have shown that the message was not from me. WAC first claimed I had put up the message and then denied any message had been posted even though I had a screen shot, which I am sure the governments also made for their files.

Using methods like this, it would be easy to stamp people who have no connection with Al Qaeda as some nebulous supporters of terrorism.

The government might be in a hurry to crack down because the CDU/CSU is set to lose power in spring in an upcoming regional election because of voter frustration over the Stuttgart 21 project.

A false flag attack could allow the conservative government of Bilderberg Angela Merkel to present itself as a “protector of the people” – and if all else fails, the election results can be always be tampered with.

If the CDU/CSU can cling to power, it can axe Merkel and “crown” Defence Minister Karl Theodor zu Guttenberg as Chancellor.

Guttenberg is a key Globalist figure and pushed through plans on November 15^th to transform the German army from a defensive force to an offensive force that can even engage in private armies. These will be much needed to patrol the unruly provinces of new German financial empire emerging as country after country collapses under artificial debt burdens and the other falls under the control of the IMF and EU/Bilderbergs in the euro trap.

Hitler’s most important banker Hjalmar Schacht – a good friend of Max Warburg and involved in the 1931 German “banking crisis” and “budget consolidation” that destroyed the German economy for the profits of the banks — noted that a strong police state was required for any society that gave banks freedom to operate.

Vienna Economics Professor Franz Hörmann explained in an interview in “Der Standard” recently how the banking system is in fact a model for fraud and robbery.

The Globalists must have calculated with the need to use massive police force to crush growing protests at the way the government is taking so much money from the people to hand it to the banks. A false flag Islamic attack on the Reichstag or an airport or station could give them the excuse to close borders and arrest critics.

A relative of the Prince August Wilhelm of Hohenzollern, Karl Friederich, Prince of Hohenzollern, is an influential figure in the CDU and sits or has sat on the board of many of the banks involved in the current banking scandal, including Bayernlb, which bought the Hypo Alpe Adria bank on the advice of the Rothschild Investment bank, overlooking the evidence of fraud.

While Guttenberg, who hails from Charlemagne’s Franconia, might be being groomed to be the new Caesar or Kaiser of the fourth German empire – emergency decrees following a Greek default could permit a EU dictatorship – the Hohenzollerns have played a prominent role so far in the first three “Holy German Empires” and it cannot be excluded that they will be among the leading figures in the “Fourth Reich” as Prince Adam of Leichtenstein called Germany.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Millennialism

Prince August Wilhelm of Hohenzollern told a crowd in Hamburg in April 1937 that “his faith in the Fuhrer was not just unshakeable but became stronger day by day.

The Fuhrer just has the wish that the German people follow him with faith— the Fuhrer believes in the loyalty of the Germany people and that is why you cannot disappoint him,” according to Lothar Machtan, historian at the university in Bremen, who wrote “Der Kaisersohn bei Hitler, 2006, Hoffmann und Campe Verlag.

Karl Friedrich is also the Sovereign Grand Master of The Order of The Dragon, which seems to be one of the Globalists secret societies like the Skull and Bones that George Bush belongs to.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Karl_Friedrich,_Prince_of_Hohenzollern

A key seat for the Hohenzollerns is Nürnberg and Hitler’s first act on entering Vienna in 1938 as part of the annexation was to order the “Spear of Destiny” kept in the museum to be sent to Nürnberg.

In the meantime, DNA tests have revealed that Hitler himself was highly likely an offspring of the Rothschilds as has long been rumoured.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/worldnews/article-1305414/Hitler-descended-Jews-Africans-DNA-tests-reveal.html

Together with Ludwig Wittgenstein, the son of one the richest men in Austria, the armaments manufacturer and Rothschild associate, Karl Wittgenstein, Hitler attended the Real Gymnasium in Linz just a stone’s throw from the Rothschild Castle in Ybbs.

The Hohenzollerns, Rothschilds…here they all are again.

http://birdflu666.wordpress.com/2010/11/22/false-flag-terrorist-attack-in-germany.....

El último regalo de al-Qaida a Israel El complot de los paquetes bomba

Maidhc Ó Cathail

Information Clearing House

Traducido del inglés para Rebelión por Germán Leyens

Aunque es posible que Al-Qaida en la Península Arábiga (AQAP, por sus siglas en inglés) haya reivindicado la responsabilidad por el complot de los paquetes bomba, vale la pena considerar en qué medida esta última alarma terrorista vinculada a Yemen ha sido un regalo para sus enemigos declarados.

Sólo dos semanas antes del descubrimiento de bombas por correo dirigidas a “dos sitios de culto judío en Chicago”, Rupert Murdoch sonó profético cuando recibió un premio de la Liga contra la Difamación (ADL) por su apoyo a Israel. “Los terroristas siguen atacando a judíos en todo el mundo”, declaró el magnate mediático en su discurso de aceptación. “Pero no han tenido éxito en derribar al gobierno israelí –y no han debilitado la determinación israelí”. Equiparando la crítica a Israel con el antisemitismo, el propietario de Fox News calumnió la creciente condena mundial de la conducta delincuente de Israel como “guerra continua contra los judíos”.

Benjamin Netanyahu, frecuente invitado en la casa de Murdoch en Londres y probable receptor de sus donaciones políticas, aprovechó rápidamente el complot frustrado. Al informar al gabinete sobre su inminente discurso ante la Asamblea General de las Federaciones Judías de Norteamérica, el primer ministro israelí dijo que “tendría lugar con el telón de fondo de informes sobre el intento de atacar a la comunidad judía en Chicago”.

Vinculando la conspiración de los paquetes bomba con algunos de los ataques terroristas más emblemáticos de la era posterior al 11-S, Netanyahu dijo que “no importa si el objetivo del ataque fue una sinagoga en Chicago o una estación de ferrocarril en Madrid, Londres, Mumbai o Bali”. Asociando hábilmente su gobierno cada vez más aislado con las víctimas de esos ataques, el primer ministro israelí proclamó: “Nos enfrentamos a una creciente ola de terrorismo del Islam extremista.”

Netanyahu, nada amigo de eufemismos, presentó este análisis del frustrado intento de utilizar impresoras de computador como armas de terror: “Crece en el alcance y en el desvergonzado descaro de sus ataques, en las armas con las que se está armando y en los amplios objetivos de los dirigentes del terrorismo global”.

Luego aseguró a sus colegas que “uno de los temas principales” que encararía en Nueva Orleans con dirigentes judíos estadounidenses eran “los pasos que el mundo civilizado y libre debe emprender para detener esta ola que nos amenaza a todos”.

Sobra decir que es poco probable que esos “pasos” incluyan un final de los 43 años de ocupación y colonización de Cisjordania o un levantamiento del bloqueo de 4 años de Gaza.

Un apologista estadounidense del autoproclamado guardián israelí del “mundo civilizado y libre” adoptó una línea similar. Joel Pollak, candidato republicano a las elecciones de mitad de período, publicó una declaración condenando el intento de ataque terrorista, diciendo que pasaría el sábado judío en West Rogers Park “en solidaridad con las gentes del 9º distrito parlamentario que fueron los objetivos directos del terror de al-Qaida”. En un tono muy similar al de Netanyahu, Pollak intentó movilizar a sus electores diciéndoles: “No debemos dejar de luchar para erradicar a los males gemelos del terror y del odio”.

De nuevo, podemos dar por sentado que sólo se insta a los estadounidenses a combatir el “terror y el odio” cuando tiene que ver con los enemigos de Israel.

DEBKA-Net-Weekly, que se describe como “el principal boletín noticioso geopolítico”, incluso ha intentado implicar al actual enemigo número uno de Israel, Irán. La próxima edición, sólo para suscriptores, promete revelar “cómo el complot de paquetes aéreos de al-Qaida se ajusta a la cooperación selectiva entre Teherán y al-Qaida y se dirige a áreas en las que coinciden sus conjuras”.

¿Pero cuán fiable es “el principal boletín noticioso en este campo enrarecido?”

“Debka está elaborado sobre todo por ex agentes del Mossad. Una corriente fiable de información”, nos asegura Martin Peretz, el islamófobo redactor jefe del New Republic, incondicional de Israel.

Desde que una firma israelí permitió que el atacante de la bomba en la entrepierna del Día de Navidad “se colara inadvertidamente” en el Aeropuerto Schiphol sin tener pasaporte, unas pocas voces influyentes con estrechos vínculos con Israel han contribuido positivamente a convertir Yemen en “el nuevo cliché de moda”.

En Fox News, dos días después, el defensor número uno de Israel y líder en el Congreso, senador Joe Lieberman, anunció: “Iraq fue la guerra de ayer. Afganistán es la guerra de hoy. Si no actuamos preventivamente, Yemen será la guerra de mañana.”

Una semana después Bruce Riedel, socio sénior en el Centro Saban en Brookings Institution, publicó un artículo editorial en The Daily Beast titulado “La amenaza de Yemen”. Promocionando el fracasado complot del Día de Navidad como evidencia de la “creciente ambición de la franquicia yemení de al-Qaida”, Riedel pidió un “apoyo significativo estadounidense para derrotar a AQAP (Al-Qaida en la Península Arábiga)”.

El empleador de Riedel, el Centro Saban, fue bautizado con el nombre de Haim Saban, el magnate mediático israelí-estadounidense, quien en 2002 prometió 13 millones de dólares para fundar el Centro Saban para Política de Oriente Próximo. Dos años después, el multimillonario admitió ante New York Times, “soy un sujeto de un solo tema, y mi tema es Israel”.

“EE.UU. podría estar metiéndose en una especie de trampa”, advierte Gregory Johnsen, un experto en Yemen y estudiante de doctorado en el Departamento de Estudios de Oriente Próximo en la Universidad de Princeton.

Esa “trampa” ha sido muy bien descrita por Philip Giraldi. “La guerra equivocada de EE.UU. contra el terror”, señaló Giraldi en un artículo reciente, “es en realidad una adopción total de los paradigmas de seguridad israelíes sin ninguna consideración por las amenazas reales que enfrenta EE.UU., convirtiendo también a los numerosos enemigos de Israel en enemigos de Washington”.

Israel debe ciertamente estar muy agradecido por este último sobresalto terrorista. Si no existiera al-Qaida en la Península Arábiga, Israel tendría que inventarlo.

Maidhc Ó Cathail es un escritor ampliamente publicado residente en Japón.

Fuente: http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article26775.h

rCR

http://www.rebelion.org/noticia.php?id=116437

Yemen’s Drive on Al Qaeda Faces Internal Skepticism

By MONA EL-NAGGAR and ROBERT F. WORTH

Published: November 3, 2010

SANA, Yemen — As Yemen intensifies its military campaign against Al Qaeda’s regional arm, it faces a serious obstacle: most Yemenis consider the group a myth, or a ploy by their president to squeeze the West for aid money and punish his domestic opponents.

Those cynical attitudes — rooted in Yemen’s history of manipulative politics — complicate any effort to track down the perpetrators of the recent plot to send explosives by courier to the United States. They also make it harder to win public support for the fight against jihadist violence, whatever label one attaches to it.

“What is Al Qaeda? The truth is there is no Al Qaeda,” said Lutfi Muhammad, a weary-looking unemployed 50-year-old walking through this city’s tumultuous Tahrir Square. Instead, he said, the violence is “because of the regime and the lack of stability and the internal struggles.”

That view, echoed across Yemen, is only partly a conspiracy theory. The Yemeni government has used jihadists as proxy soldiers in the past, and sometimes conflates the Qaeda threat and the unrelated political insurgencies it has fought in northern and southern Yemen in recent years. In a country where political and tribal violence is endemic, it is often impossible to tell who is killing whom, and why.

One thing is clear: Yemen’s president, Ali Abdullah Saleh, has stepped up his commitment to fighting Al Qaeda in the past year, with far more military raids and airstrikes, including some carried out by the American military. His government has paid a price. On Saturday, a day after the discovery of the air freight bomb plot, Mr. Saleh said during a news conference that Al Qaeda had killed 70 police officers and soldiers in the past four weeks. That is a sharp increase over previous years, and some analysts have taken it as proof that Al Qaeda’s Yemen-based branch is growing.

But many Yemenis seem doubtful that Al Qaeda was guilty in all or even most of those killings, which took place in the same southern parts of the country where a secessionist movement has been growing for the past three years.

“We cannot differentiate between what is propaganda and what is real,” said Abdullah al-Faqih, a professor of political science at Sana University. “It’s impossible to tell who is killing who; you have tribal feuds, Al Qaeda and the Southern Movement, and the state is doing a lot of manipulation.”

In a sense, there are two narratives about Al Qaeda in Yemen. One of them, presented by both the Yemeni government and Al Qaeda’s Internet postings — and echoed in the West — portrays a black-and-white struggle between the groups. The other narrative is the view from the ground in Yemen: a confusing welter of attacks by armed groups with shifting loyalties, some fighting under political or religious banners, some merely looking for money.

The Yemeni authorities have long paid tribal leaders to fight domestic enemies, or even other tribes that were causing trouble for the government. That policy has helped foster a culture of blackmail: some tribal figures promote violence, whether through jihadists or mere criminals, and then offer to quell it in exchange for cash.

“Some of what looks like Al Qaeda is really terror as a business,” Mr. Faqih said.

Yemen’s tribes are often cast as the chief obstacle in the fight against Al Qaeda, sheltering the militants because of tribal hospitality or even ideological kinship. In fact, few tribal leaders have any sympathy for the group, and some tribes have forced Qaeda members to leave their areas in the past year.

In a statement released Tuesday, a group identifying itself as Al Qaeda members from the Awlaq tribe — one of Yemen’s largest — pleaded with their fellow tribesmen for support, noting that “we were deeply saddened to see the leaders, chiefs, and dignitaries of our community go personally to meet with the government envoy.”

Instead, Al Qaeda seems to thrive where tribal authority has eroded, or in the southern areas where hatred of the government is most intense. In many of the recent attacks, it is difficult to draw a line between Al Qaeda and angry, impoverished young men who have easy access to weapons.

This is particularly true of the secessionist movement in the south. “There are many unemployed young men and people with personal interests who rebelled against the state and against the movement itself,” said Saleh al-Hanashi, an adviser to the governor of Abyan, a southern province where the protest movement thrives and many of the recent killings have taken place. “They became these chaos-inciting groups. And these groups now in Abyan shoot at cars belonging to the state and do other destructive acts against the state.” This kind of vandalism is easily attributed to Al Qaeda, whether the group claims responsibility for it or not. The latest issue of the group’s English-language magazine, Inspire, features a banner headline on the front cover: “Photos From the Operations of Abyan.” Inside, there are gruesome pictures of burning Jeeps and dead Yemeni soldiers.

Many southerners view Mr. Saleh’s government as an occupying force, and while the secessionist movement’s leaders say they reject violence, some of its members may be willing to make common cause with jihadists. North and south Yemen, once separate countries, unified in 1990, then fought a bitter civil war four years later. Many in the south say they have been treated unequally ever since.

It is possible that the worsening carnage in southern Yemen, and Al Qaeda’s claims of responsibility for it, will eventually lead to a shift in perceptions and broader support for the government’s agenda. That is what happened in Saudi Arabia, where attitudes toward Al Qaeda were similar to those in Yemen until the group began carrying out bloody attacks in Saudi cities in 2003. Public opinion soon swung sharply against the jihadists, and by 2006 the Saudis had crushed the group.

That is far less likely in Yemen, with its terrible poverty and weak central government. For now, most Yemenis seem to dismiss reports of Al Qaeda killings as a “masrah,” or drama, staged by the government and its American backers. The suspicion runs so deep that any action by the Yemeni government seems to confirm it: counterterrorist raids are often described as punitive measures against domestic foes, and the failure to act decisively is derided as collusion.

“This latest episode with the packages is only making it worse,” said Mr. Faqih, the Sana University professor. “Many people think it was all about the elections in the U.S., or an excuse for American military intervention here.”

Mona El-Naggar reported from Sana, and Robert F. Worth from Beirut, Lebanon.